RiskMandate v1.0.0
After the demo

Turn a fresh reaction into structured evidence.

You have just seen RiskMandate. The most useful thing you can give us is what did not land — and the worst way to collect that is a form you fill in next week. Instead, ChatGPT interviews you by voice while it is fresh, you review what it wrote, and you decide what we see.

See the demos again
The loop

Six steps, about twenty minutes.

The prompt

Copy this into a fresh ChatGPT conversation.

It will read our site first and tell you when it is ready. Then switch to voice mode and say hello. Everything after that is a conversation.

What to expect

Honest answers are the useful ones.

It asks for criticism first

The interview is built to find what did not land. Praise is pleasant and less useful — the debrief leads with objections deliberately.

You control what we see

It asks explicitly whether we may quote you and whether we may follow up. You read the evidence pack before anything is sent, and you send it yourself.

It will admit what it does not know

Most of RiskMandate is proposed rather than shipped, and the interviewer is told to say so instead of guessing. If it invents something, that is a bug — tell us.

Twenty minutes, or ten

Say at the start if you are short of time and it will cover the priority areas only: what landed, the insurability framing, and your objections.

Thank you — really.

Twenty minutes of honest reaction from someone who has just seen the thing is worth more than a month of us guessing.